From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodge v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 2, 2007
No. CIV S-02-2157 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-2157 DFL EFB P.

July 2, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 18, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 18, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Hodge v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 2, 2007
No. CIV S-02-2157 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2007)
Case details for

Hodge v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:ARBBIE M. HODGE, Petitioner, v. THOMAS L. CAREY, WARDEN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 2, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-02-2157 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2007)

Citing Cases

Reese v. Clark Cnty. Det. Ctr.

In this case, the Court is unaware of—and Plaintiff does not provide—any clearly established right to have…