noting that the plaintiff's claim for monetary relief is barred by the Eleventh Amendment because his complaint does not show that the defendants were sued as individuals rather than in their official capacity as state employees; citing Wells
Summary of this case from Moore v. City of HarrimanNo. 89-6230.
January 17, 1991.
E.D.Ky.; With-drawing 910 F.2d 367.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
noting that the plaintiff's claim for monetary relief is barred by the Eleventh Amendment because his complaint does not show that the defendants were sued as individuals rather than in their official capacity as state employees; citing Wells
Summary of this case from Moore v. City of HarrimanIn Henry Wright Corp. v. Automatic Press Corp., 924 F.2d 1058 (6th Cir. 1991) (unpublished disposition), the Sixth Circuit affirmatively stated that an injury need not be direct for a person to sue under RICO.
Summary of this case from County of Oakland v. City of DetroitFull title:Hodge Business Computer Systems, Inc. v. U.S.A. Mobile Communications…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Jan 17, 1991
tify the defendants that they could be personally liable for damages under § 1983, the suit was against the…
County of Oakland v. City of DetroitHowever, a later Sixth Circuit case has addressed this issue. In Henry Wright Corp. v. Automatic Press…