January 16, 1956
Present — Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.
In an action to recover damages, based upon the alleged fraudulent alteration of a certain warehouse receipt, the complaint was dismissed after trial. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Full title:FRANK H. HILLEL et al., Doing Business as F.H. HILLEL CO., Appellants, v…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jan 16, 1956
As Defendants argue, the tort statute of limitations has been applied as well to bar actions alleging…
Icelandic Air v. CanadairIn New York, CPLR 214 (subd 4) provides that an action to recover damages for an injury to property must be…