From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Fields

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 3, 2002
813 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

holding that wife petitioning for domestic violence injunction was required to file in county of former husband's residence and venue in county of wife's residence was improper

Summary of this case from Weimorts v. Shockley

Opinion

No. 2D01-1473.

April 3, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pasco County, Daniel D. Diskey, J.

Leonard J. Connors, Plant City, for Appellant.

James L. Slater of Slater Young, P.A., Palm Harbor, for Appellee.


Lawrence Hill, II, challenges a temporary domestic violence injunction entered against him, specifically challenging the venue of the action in Pasco County. Because the cause of action filed against him by Carissa Fields did not support venue in Pasco County on any basis set forth in section 47.011, Florida Statutes (1999), we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Almost a year following the dissolution of their marriage in Pasco County, Ms. Fields, the former wife, filed a petition for a domestic violence injunction on behalf of herself and the parties' two minor children against Mr. Hill, the former husband. Although Ms. Fields and the children reside in Pasco County, Mr. Hill resides in Polk County. The petition for a domestic violence injunction set forth alleged incidents occurring in Polk County.

[1, 2] Following service of the temporary injunction, Mr. Hill filed a motion to dismiss challenging both venue and jurisdiction. He argued that the petition for a domestic violence injunction filed pursuant to chapter 741, Florida Statutes (1999), was filed in an improper venue. There is validity to this argument. Chapter 741 does not contain a provision regarding venue; therefore, the general venue statute, chapter 47, applies. See Barr v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 644 So.2d 333, 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Section 47.011 provides that actions shall be brought only in the county where the defendant resides, here, Polk County; where the cause of action accrued, again, Polk County; or where the property in litigation is located, a provision that is not applicable in this case. Accordingly, venue was proper in Polk County, not in Pasco County. We note that it appears that legal relief was available to Ms. Fields in Pasco County, including, but not limited to, a modification of the dissolution of marriage.

[3] The remedy, however, was not the dismissal of the petition as sought by Mr. Hill, but a transfer to the proper venue according to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.060. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order and direct that the case be transferred to Polk County.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hill v. Fields

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 3, 2002
813 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

holding that wife petitioning for domestic violence injunction was required to file in county of former husband's residence and venue in county of wife's residence was improper

Summary of this case from Weimorts v. Shockley
Case details for

Hill v. Fields

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE HILL, II, Appellant, v. CARISSA FIELDS, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 3, 2002

Citations

813 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Weimorts v. Shockley

Barr v. Fla. Bd. of Regents, 644 So.2d 333, 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Under section 47.011, "[a]ctions shall…

Griffith v. Crosby

However, the court erred in characterizing this as a jurisdictional issue and in dismissing, rather than…