Summary
In Higgins v. Vitran Express Inc., No. 1:09cv228, 2009 WL 3873662 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 18, 2009) (unpublished), the court granted a motion to dismiss filed by a defendant-corporation which the plaintiff identified in his complaint as a "customer" of his employer.
Summary of this case from Morris v. Mich. Auto. Compressor, Inc.Opinion
Case Number: 1:09cv228.
November 18, 2009
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan filed on October 19, 2009 (Doc. 29), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired November 6, 2009, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, defendant Parker Hannifin's motion to dismiss (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.