From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. Heinze

U.S.
Oct 14, 1963
375 U.S. 26 (1963)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 82, Misc.

Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.


Summaries of

Herrera v. Heinze

U.S.
Oct 14, 1963
375 U.S. 26 (1963)
Case details for

Herrera v. Heinze

Case Details

Full title:HERRERA v . HEINZE, WARDEN

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 14, 1963

Citations

375 U.S. 26 (1963)

Citing Cases

Henry v. City of Rock Hill

When this case was last before us, we granted certiorari, vacated the judgment holding petitioners guilty of…

Donnell v. Swenson

It is no bar that the pertinent events of Stevens' conviction occurred before the decision in Douglas v.…