From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 26, 1984
457 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-647.

October 26, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; Harry Lee Coe, III, Judge.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and L.S. Alperstein, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Karla J. Staker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We disagree with the appellant's two contentions.

There was sufficient evidence to support the order of the trial judge finding that the appellant violated conditions of his probation. Furthermore, it was proper for the trial judge to depart from the sentencing guidelines using the violation of probation by the appellant as the basis for doing so. Addison v. State, 452 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 26, 1984
457 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Hernandez v. State

Case Details

Full title:JUAN HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 26, 1984

Citations

457 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Townsend v. State

A violation of a substantive condition of probation can serve as a reason for a trial court to exceed the…

Hall v. State

The state responds that at the sentencing hearing the judge instructed that a written order be prepared…