From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heilmann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 15, 2002
832 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 5D02-1873

Opinion filed November 15, 2002 Rehearing Denied December 26, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, Robert K. Mathis, Judge.

Joel P. Heilmann II, Sanderson, Pro Se.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lamya A. Henry, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Joel P. Heilmann seeks review of the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the circuit court. Heilmann raises issues which were or could have been raised in the direct appeal of his conviction, and, therefore cannot be raised in a habeas corpus petition. See Teffeteller v. Dugger, 734 So.2d 1009, 1016 (Fla. 1999). Additionally, the issues now asserted were raised in his two prior postconviction proceedings. Accordingly, Heilmann's petition is successive. See Johnson v. Singletary, 695 So.2d 263, 265-66 (Fla. 1996).

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Heilmann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 15, 2002
832 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Heilmann v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOEL P. HEILMANN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 15, 2002

Citations

832 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Jenkins v. State

We agree with the State that habeas corpus petitions should not be used for additional appeals on questions…

Cook v. Crosby

Cook has raised this issue in previous post-conviction motions; hence the petition was procedurally barred.…