From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heidenstrauch v. Bankers Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 25, 1990
564 So. 2d 581 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1129.

July 25, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Mary E. Lupo, J.

Robert T. Bergin, Jr. of Bergin Culler, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

G. Bart Billbrough of Walton Lantaff Schroeder Carson, Miami, for appellee.


Mari Heidenstrauch brings this appeal questioning the constitutionality of section 627.739, Florida Statutes (1983). She argues that allowing deductibles up to $2,000.00 in personal injury protection (PIP) coverages where the insured has no collateral coverage and without making another remedy available to the insured to recover the deductible amount (such as by suit against the exempt tortfeasor) is a denial of access to the courts in violation of article I, section 21 of the Florida Constitution. Our sister court in the third district has recently decided this issue adversely to appellant's position. Verdecia v. American Risk Assurance Co., 543 So.2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 551 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1989). We do not agree with the Verdecia court's position on standing, but we agree with the holding that the statute is constitutional and we have no quarrel with the rationale behind that holding. Accordingly, we follow Verdecia and affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Heidenstrauch v. Bankers Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 25, 1990
564 So. 2d 581 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Heidenstrauch v. Bankers Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARI HEIDENSTRAUCH, APPELLANT, v. BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY, A FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 25, 1990

Citations

564 So. 2d 581 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)