From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 26, 1991
575 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2304.

February 26, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, F.E. Steinmeyer, J.

Barbara M. Linthicum, Public Defender, Abel Gomez, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Suzanne G. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant/defendant, David Scott Haynes, appeals an order directing him to pay $704 in additional restitution to the victim. We affirm the $600 portion of the order, representing 30 hours in lost overtime pay, finding the victim's testimony to have been undisputed and the award to have been specifically authorized by section 775.089(2)(c), Florida Statutes. However, we reverse the $35 portion representing meal expenses associated with the victim's travel to the restitution hearing, since the victim testified that the cost of his meals was actually $20. We therefore remand for the total amount of restitution ordered to be reduced by $15.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED.

WIGGINTON and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haynes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 26, 1991
575 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Haynes v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SCOTT HAYNES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 26, 1991

Citations

575 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Neal v. State

Moreover, section 775.089(2)(b) expressly permits reimbursement for income lost as a result of the offense,…