holding that realtors who learned of defendant's wrongdoing from an insider and conducted an investigation to confirm the allegations, did not have "direct and independent" knowledge because they "did not see the fraud with their own eyes or obtain their knowledge of it through their own labor unmediated by anything else."
Summary of this case from U.S. ex Rel. Grynberg v. Praxair, Inc.No. 96-280.
October 21, 1996.
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 70 F. 3d 92.
holding that realtors who learned of defendant's wrongdoing from an insider and conducted an investigation to confirm the allegations, did not have "direct and independent" knowledge because they "did not see the fraud with their own eyes or obtain their knowledge of it through their own labor unmediated by anything else."
Summary of this case from U.S. ex Rel. Grynberg v. Praxair, Inc.Full title:HAYGOOD ET UX. v. SAVAGE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 21, 1996
Whatever the label, whether extra- or intrajudicial, parties seeking recusal bear a heavy burden to…
Waymark Corp. v. Porta Systems Corp.When applying 35 U.S.C. § 285, we follow our own law, as it is a patent statute. Pharmacia Upjohn Co. v.…