From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 5, 1962
16 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

April 5, 1962

Appeal from the Oneida Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.


Order dismissing the second amended complaint as to certain defendants unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and motion denied, without costs and without prejudice to the right to renew in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: See our Memorandum in Hayes v. Utica Mutual Ins. Co. ( 16 A.D.2d 732) decided herewith. We also add that this same motion had originally been denied as to these defendants. The motion which resulted in this order was not for reargument but was a completely new motion, and nothing new or additional was submitted or added. Nevertheless Special Term granted the motion which previously had been denied. This, of course, was improper.


Summaries of

Hayes v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 5, 1962
16 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Hayes v. Hoffman

Case Details

Full title:MAUDE K. HAYES, Appellant, v. RALPH HOFFMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1962

Citations

16 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Zweig v. Industrial Comm

Under the rule of constitutional law, one may not "`retain the benefits of the act while attacking the…

Welton v. 40 East Oak St. Bldg. Corporation

" Other cases dealing specifically with the effect of pendency of proceedings upon existence of good faith in…