From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hathaway v. Tindall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 16, 1986
497 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-1027.

November 4, 1986. Rehearing Denied December 16, 1986.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court, for Dade County; Milton A. Friedman, Judge.

Stanley M. Rosenblatt and Susan Rosenblatt and Alan T. Lipson, Miami, for appellants.

Stephens, Lynn, Chernay Klein and Robert M. Klein and Debra J. Snow, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


Even if, arguendo, the plaintiffs established that the defendant hospital made certain representations that might lead reasonable persons to believe that the radiologist in question was the hospital's agent, they utterly failed to prove that they were aware of, much less relied on, any of these representations or detrimentally changed their position in reliance on them. See Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. Robbins, 433 So.2d 491 (Fla. 1983). Therefore, the trial court was correct in rejecting the plaintiffs' claim that the radiologist was an apparent agent of the hospital and in directing a verdict for the hospital. The plaintiffs' remaining point on appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hathaway v. Tindall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 16, 1986
497 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Hathaway v. Tindall

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND HATHAWAY AND BETTY HATHAWAY, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS, v. ROBERT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 16, 1986

Citations

497 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Orlando Regional Med. v. Chmielewski

ORMC argues that even if the circumstances in this case were sufficient to establish an implied…

Menzie v. Windham Cmty. Mem'l Hosp.

There is no evidence, for example, that plaintiff consented to treatment after the hospital led him to…