From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvey v. Alameda County Medical Center

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 18, 2005
123 F. App'x 823 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted March 14, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

As Amended April 4, 2005.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

William R. Hopkins, Wells & Hopkins, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Stephanie M. Wells, Wells & Hopkins, San Francisco, CA, Clyde A. Thompson, Esq., Strickland, Haapala, Altura, Harnett, Maguire & Thompson, Gregory James Rockwell, Boornazian Jensen & Garthe, Oakland, CA, Molly C. Machold, for Defendants-Appellees.


123 Fed.Appx. 823 (9th Cir. 2005)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-01382-MMC.

Before: HAWKINS, MCKEOWN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

We affirm the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment on Dorothy Harvey's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Alameda County, the Alameda County Medical Center, and Dr. Milton Lorig.

A public entity can only be liable when it commits constitutional violations pursuant to the entity's official policy or custom, Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 690-92, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978), or due to inadequate training rising to the level of deliberate indifference. City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 390, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989). Harvey has presented no genuine issue of material fact that Alameda County (1) has a policy of not requiring deputies to determine that a detainee has a mental disorder, as required when executing a Section 5150 hold under the California Welfare and Institutions Code, (2) has failed to train deputies on Section 5150 holds, or (3) has a policy condoning excessive force in executing a Section 5150 hold.

Similarly, Harvey has presented no genuine issue of material fact that the Alameda County Medical Center has a policy of restraining or sedating patients when they are cooperative or nonresistant.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Harvey v. Alameda County Medical Center

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 18, 2005
123 F. App'x 823 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

Harvey v. Alameda County Medical Center

Case Details

Full title:Dorothy HARVEY, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 18, 2005

Citations

123 F. App'x 823 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

Julian v. Mission Cmty. Hosp.

Because the plaintiff filed suit beyond the one-year statute of limitations, the court affirmed dismissal of…