From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 17, 2010
27 So. 3d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2D08-5267.

February 17, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Maria E. Gonzalez, Acting Circuit Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard M. Fishkin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Anthony Hartley was convicted of: count one, felony battery with great bodily harm and count two, burglary of a conveyance with a battery. He contends that we should reverse his conviction for count two because the trial court denied his request for a jury instruction on burglary, a necessarily lesser-included offense of burglary of a conveyance with a battery. The State concedes the error.

When requested, trial courts are required to instruct juries on necessarily lesser-included offenses of the charged offense. State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1978); Miller v. State, 870 So.2d 15 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Simple burglary is a necessarily lesser-included offense of burglary with a battery. Because the jury did not have the opportunity to consider whether Mr. Hartley was guilty of the lesser offense of burglary, we affirm his conviction for count one, but reverse his judgment and sentence for count two and remand for a new trial.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CASANUEVA, C.J., and CRENSHAW, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Hartley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 17, 2010
27 So. 3d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Hartley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony HARTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 17, 2010

Citations

27 So. 3d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Cannon v. State

If the defendant had only intended to commit a battery, his act would not legally constitute burglary of a…