From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hartley v. Guetzloe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 2, 1998
712 So. 2d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

reversing denial of attorney's fees under legally sufficient offer of judgment because the trial court denied the motion based solely on one of the enumerated factors under section 768.79(b)

Summary of this case from Braaksma v. Pratt

Opinion

No. 97-2565

Opinion Filed July 2, 1998 JANUARY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, R. James Stroker, Judge.

Todd K. Norman of Hartley Wall, Orlando, for Appellants.

Frederic B. O'Neal, Windermere, for Appellees.


Carl W. Hartley and Richard F. Wall appeal the trial court's denial of attorney's fees after they requested an award pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1995). Hartley and Wall obtained a judgment more than 25% greater than the amount demanded in their offer of judgment.

An award of attorney's fees is mandatory under section 768.79, where the requirements of the statute are met, unless the trial court determines the offer was not made in good faith. TGI Friday's, Inc. v. Dvorak, 663 So.2d 606 (Fla. 1995); Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

Here, there was no finding that the appellants' offer of judgment was not made in good faith. Instead, the reason for the denial of the motion for attorney's fees was because the questions of fact and law were extremely close. We find this an improper basis on which to deny the motion for attorney fees. See Puleo v. Knealing, 654 So.2d 148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (because there has been no finding that appellants' offer of judgment was not made in good faith, trial court's denial of appellants' motion to tax attorney's fees and costs must be reversed, as it improperly applied a "reasonableness of rejection" standard in determining whether the appellants were entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to section 768.79), approved 675 So.2d 593, 595 (Fla. 1996).

The appellants' motion for appellate attorney's fees and costs is also granted. §§ 59.46 768.79(1), Fla. Stat. (1995); Williams v. Brochu, 578 So.2d 491, 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). We reverse and remand so that the trial court can determine the appropriate amount of reasonable attorney's fees to be assessed.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hartley v. Guetzloe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 2, 1998
712 So. 2d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

reversing denial of attorney's fees under legally sufficient offer of judgment because the trial court denied the motion based solely on one of the enumerated factors under section 768.79(b)

Summary of this case from Braaksma v. Pratt
Case details for

Hartley v. Guetzloe

Case Details

Full title:CARL W. HARTLEY, JR., et al., Appellants, v. DOUGLAS M. GUETZLOE, et al.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 2, 1998

Citations

712 So. 2d 817 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Motter Roofing, Inc., v. Leibowitz

Section 768.79(1), Florida Statutes (2001), provides for mandatory recovery of reasonable costs and…

Jacobsen v. Trussell

Although an offeror is required to have a reasonable basis upon which to base its offer, the trial court's…