From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrisson v. Fla. Parole Probation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 23, 1983
428 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-2144.

March 23, 1983.

Petitioner, pro se.

Enoch J. Whitney, Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole and Probation Com'n, Tallahassee, for respondent.


Petitioner seeks review of his presumptive parole release date, by petition for writ of habeas corpus filed some two years after the Florida Parole and Probation Commission set the date. We treat the petition for habeas corpus as a petition for mandamus directed against the FPPC. Moore v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 289 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1974), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 935, 94 S.Ct. 2649, 41 L.Ed.2d 239 (1974); Hardy v. Greadington, 405 So.2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Pannier v. Wainwright, 423 So.2d 533 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). We deny the writ. The response to the order to show cause demonstrates that the Commission has corrected an earlier error in computing petitioner's presumptive parole release date. Section 947.172(3), Florida Statutes (1978) does not prevent the correction of a mere clerical error. Wickham v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

PETITION DENIED.

ANSTEAD, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Harrisson v. Fla. Parole Probation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 23, 1983
428 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Harrisson v. Fla. Parole Probation

Case Details

Full title:GARY A. HARRISSON, PETITIONER, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 23, 1983

Citations

428 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Shannon v. Turner

Petitioner seeks review of his presumptive parole release date. We treat the petition for habeas corpus as a…

Shannon v. Mitchell

Our inquiry now is not into the root causes of his criminal conduct, but only into whether the Florida Parole…