Summary
Affirming Magistrate Judge's finding that "even if the challenged food service had caused Plaintiff a constitutionally cognizable harm, there was no evidence that demonstrated that [Defendants'] deliberate indifference was the cause of that harm."
Summary of this case from Holbrook v. W. Va. Reg'l Jail & Corr. Facility Auth.Opinion
No. 07-6346.
Submitted: July 31, 2007.
Decided: August 8, 2007.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (9:06-cv-01203-PMD).
Eugene Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. John K. Blincow, Jr., Ashley S. Heslop, Turner, Padget, Graham Laney, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina; Joseph DuRant Thompson, III, Haynsworth, Sinkler Boyd, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, Davidson, Morrison Lindemann, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Eugene Harrison appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Moketa, 485 F.Supp.2d 652 (D.S.C. 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.