From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 8, 1965
344 F.2d 903 (5th Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 21683.

April 30, 1965. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1965.

Guy B. Scott, Jr., Athens, Ga., for appellant.

Floyd M. Buford, U.S. Atty., Gary B. Blasingame, Asst. U.S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS, and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

Senior Judge of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.


The conviction of appellant of the offense of possession of property used or intended to be used in violation of the Internal Revenue Laws, 26 U.S.C.A. § 5686(a) was based partially on circumstantial evidence, as is nearly every criminal prosecution involving intent. We find the evidence ample to warrant submission to the jury the question of the intended use of the 17,700 pounds of sugar, loaded on the truck driven at night by the appellant, after he had rented it under an assumed name. Its finding of guilt is fully supported.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Harper v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 8, 1965
344 F.2d 903 (5th Cir. 1965)
Case details for

Harper v. United States

Case Details

Full title:William Grady HARPER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 8, 1965

Citations

344 F.2d 903 (5th Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

United States v. Carter

On this record, the jury could not reasonably have concluded that the evidence excluded every reasonable…