From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. City of Monterey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 21, 2013
519 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-15353 D.C. No. 5:11-cv-02903-LHK

05-21-2013

RANDALL LYNN HARPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF MONTEREY; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Lucy Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Randall Lynn Harper appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various federal and state law claims related to his car being towed. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 519 F.3d 1025, 1030 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

Contrary to Harper's contentions, the clerk properly declined Harper's requests for entry of default because defendants filed timely motions to dismiss Harper's action for failure to state a claim. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) (providing that a default can be entered against a party only where that party "has failed to plead or otherwise defend").

Harper's contentions regarding personal jurisdiction and venue are unpersuasive.

Harper's pending motions for judicial notice and entry of default are denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Harper v. City of Monterey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 21, 2013
519 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Harper v. City of Monterey

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL LYNN HARPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF MONTEREY; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 21, 2013

Citations

519 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Hill v. Bonnifield

Generally, as here, when a party has defended an action by filing a motion to dismiss, even if untimely,…

Diamond S.J. Enter., Inc. v. City of San Jose

Under California law, a "cause of action" is defined for purposes of claim preclusion by "employing a…