From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harmon v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 2, 2015
160 So. 3d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 5D14–1932.

2015-04-02

Rodney S. HARMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy , Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering , Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Hale R. Stancil, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Andrea K. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant's convictions and sentences except as to the assessment of the public defender fee. We reverse the trial court's assessment of $500 for public defender fees. The trial court was obligated to assess Appellant at least $100 in fees and costs because he was convicted of a felony. § 938.29(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013). However, a trial court may only assess more than $100 in fees after it makes factual findings of the “higher fees or costs incurred.” Id. Here, the trial court assessed $500 in fees and costs against Appellant without considering any evidence. The trial court also failed to inform Appellant of his right to contest the assessment.

The State properly conceded error here and in the trial court in response to Appellant's proper motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). However, the trial court did not rule on the motion within the required sixty days, and thus, it was deemed denied.

We strike the assessment of public defender fees without prejudice and remand for an evidentiary hearing. Hayes v. State, 69 So.3d 1035, 1037 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Houle v. State, 33 So.3d 822, 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). On remand, the trial court must advise Appellant of his right to contest any lien imposed for public defender fees.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.




Summaries of

Harmon v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 2, 2015
160 So. 3d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Harmon v. State

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY S. HARMON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 2, 2015

Citations

160 So. 3d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Mojica v. State

However, as set forth in that statute, any indigent legal assistant assessment over the mandatory minimum fee…

Williams v. State

However, we reverse the trial court's imposition of a public defender lien for failure to comply with section…