From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harjim, Inc. et al. v. O'Bannon

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Sep 2, 1930
100 Fla. 755 (Fla. 1930)

Opinion

Opinion filed September 2, 1930. Petition for rehearing denied October 7, 1930.

Supersedeas denied.

H. J. Quincy, Custis Nottingham and James R. Roads, for Appellants;

Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and H. E. Carter, Assistant, for Appellees.


Section 1008 Comp. Gen. Laws, 1927, contemplates that where a suit is brought "to enjoin any tax sale or to set aside or cancel any tax certificate" there must be "paid to the tax collector the full amount of the taxes which could have been lawfully assessed against the property for the period covered by the assessment complained of" and that "the amount of such tax" which may be "lawfully assessed" shall be determined by the court and duly paid before the injunction issues.

The decree dated July 29, 1930, that is here appealed from, dissolves an injunction granted July 2, 1928, restraining the sale of lands for the non-payment of taxes due thereon for the year 1927, without a compliance with section 1008, supra, before the injunction was granted. An order is applied for under Section 4962 Comp. Gen. Laws, 1927, to supersede the decree dissolving the injunction, thereby reinstating the injunction. As, in review of the provisions of Section 1008 Comp. Gen. Laws, 1927, the injunction was erroneously granted, the decree dissolving the injunction was proper.

Supersedeas denied.

TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD, STRUM and BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Harjim, Inc. et al. v. O'Bannon

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Sep 2, 1930
100 Fla. 755 (Fla. 1930)
Case details for

Harjim, Inc. et al. v. O'Bannon

Case Details

Full title:HARJIM, INC., a Corporation, SEWARD INVESTMENT CO., a Corporation, HARRY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Sep 2, 1930

Citations

100 Fla. 755 (Fla. 1930)
129 So. 918

Citing Cases

Henderson v. Leatherman

An injunction having been granted and dissolved, an appeal was taken and supersedeas granted. The cause is…

Ranger Realty Co. v. Hefty

Where levies and assessments are authorized by law and the valuation of the property for assessment purposes…