From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanna v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct 4, 2017
232 So. 3d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that the trial court's reliance on the defendant's stipulation to his competency was erroneous, and declining to infer that the defendant stipulated to the contents of the report where "neither party specifically stipulated to the report , but instead, plainly stipulated to the competency"

Summary of this case from Pittman v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 4D16–770

10-04-2017

Raymond HANNA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed in part. Reversed in part. Remanded.

Summaries of

Hanna v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct 4, 2017
232 So. 3d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

holding that the trial court's reliance on the defendant's stipulation to his competency was erroneous, and declining to infer that the defendant stipulated to the contents of the report where "neither party specifically stipulated to the report , but instead, plainly stipulated to the competency"

Summary of this case from Pittman v. State
Case details for

Hanna v. State

Case Details

Full title:Raymond HANNA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Oct 4, 2017

Citations

232 So. 3d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Pittman v. State

By contrast, where the parties have not agreed to decide the issue of competency on the basis of the expert's…

Burney v. State

See Carrion v. State, 235 So.3d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ("The trial court erred in failing to make an…

2 Citing Cases