From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 1989
552 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-2054.

November 30, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Jeffords D. Miller, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancye R. Crouch, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paula C. Coffman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Defendant Daniel Hamilton appeals from the judgments and sentences imposed by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of committing the offenses of possession of cocaine and sale or delivery of cocaine. Hamilton contends that the trial court violated the prohibition against double jeopardy by imposing judgment and sentence on both convictions because the convictions were predicated upon a single criminal act, the sale of one rock of crack cocaine to an undercover police officer. We agree. See Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1987). See also Davis v. State, 550 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and sentence imposed on the possession charge. Remand, however, is not necessary because the trial court sentenced Hamilton within the recommended guidelines range and reversal of the possession conviction does not change the recommended guidelines range.

The offenses involved occurred prior to July 1, 1988, the effective date of Ch. 88-131, § 7, Laws of Fla. See Smith v. State, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1989).

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part.

COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hamilton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 30, 1989
552 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Hamilton v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL HAMILTON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 30, 1989

Citations

552 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Roberts v. State

The state properly concedes error. See Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1987).See also McKinney v.…