From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halloran v. Thomas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 12, 2014
573 F. App'x 622 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-17274 D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02443-SRB-JFM

05-12-2014

PETER HALLORAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TODD THOMAS, Warden - Saguaro Correctional Center; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding


Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Peter Halloran appeals pro se from the district court's denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Halloran v. Thomas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 12, 2014
573 F. App'x 622 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Halloran v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:PETER HALLORAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TODD THOMAS, Warden - Saguaro…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 12, 2014

Citations

573 F. App'x 622 (9th Cir. 2014)