From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hall v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jan 15, 2012
Case No. 3:10cv71/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10cv71/MCR/MD

01-15-2012

STEVEN HALL, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated October 5, 2011 (doc. 31) . The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. The clerk is directed to close this file.

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

____________

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hall v. Tucker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Jan 15, 2012
Case No. 3:10cv71/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Hall v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN HALL, Petitioner, v. KENNETH S. TUCKER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:10cv71/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2012)

Citing Cases

Clark v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.

Reply at 20, 24. He states that he was not prohibited from doing so because the Florida Supreme Court's…