Hall v. State

Full title: CHADRICK A. HALL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Sep 23, 2019

279 So. 3d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D18-4206

09-23-2019

Chadrick A. HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED. See Brannon v. State , 850 So. 2d 452, 456 (Fla. 2003) (finding that habitual felony offender designation could not be reviewed in the absence of filing a 3.800(b) motion preserving the issue); Daniels v. State, 118 So. 3d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding that a discrepancy between the oral sentence pronouncement and the written judgment and sentence could not be corrected where the appellant did not preserve the sentencing error).

B.L. Thomas, Rowe, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.