From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haley v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 10, 1966
357 F.2d 722 (9th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 20462.

March 10, 1966.

James Haley, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Robert R. Granucci, Michael R. Marron, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.


Appellant seeks relief, by habeas corpus, from state imprisonment following state conviction of the crime of possession of marijuana.

The District Court denied the writ. In its order it noted:

"On page three of the petition filed herein, petitioner states that `the public defender said he would take care of the appeal.' No appeal was taken. California Rules of Court, Rule 31(a), provides that in a proper case petitioner may seek relief from his default in failing to file a timely notice of appeal in a criminal case. See People v. Curry, 62 A.C. 211 [ 62 Cal.2d 207, 42 Cal.Rptr. 17, 397 P.2d 1009] (1965)."

The Court ruled:

"Petitioner has failed to exhaust available state remedies. The petition is, therefore, denied."

We agree.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Haley v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 10, 1966
357 F.2d 722 (9th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Haley v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:James HALEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lawrence E. WILSON, Warden, San…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 10, 1966

Citations

357 F.2d 722 (9th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Lembke v. Field

The district court in denying appellant's petition for a writ relied upon the fact that appellant had not…

Barry v. Sigler

It is also well established a petitioner may not deliberately bypass any available appeal to the Supreme…