From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halbig v. Burwell

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2014
No. 14-5018 (D.C. Cir. Sep. 4, 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-5018 1:13-cv-00623-PLF

09-04-2014

Jacqueline Halbig, et al., Appellants v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., Appellees


BEFORE: Garland, Chief Judge, and Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Brown, Griffith, Kavanaugh, Srinivasan, Millett, Pillard, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges ORDER

Upon consideration of appellees' petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the vote in favor of the petition by a majority of the judges eligible to participate, it is

ORDERED that the petition be granted. Case No. 14-5018 will be reheard by the court sitting en banc. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment filed July 22, 2014, be vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the oral argument before the en banc court be heard at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, December 17, 2014, in Courtroom #20, Sixth Floor. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to filing briefs electronically, the parties file 30 paper copies of each of their briefs and the appendix, in accordance with the following schedule:

Brief for Appellants October 3, 2014



Joint Appendix October 3, 2014



Brief(s) for Amici Curiae for Appellants October 3, 2014
Brief for Appellees November 3, 2014



Brief(s) for Amici Curiae for Appellees November 3, 2014



Reply Brief for Appellants November 17, 2014

Parties are directed to hand deliver the paper copies of their briefs to the Clerk's office by the date due. To enhance the clarity of their briefs, the parties are urged to limit the use of abbreviations, including acronyms. While acronyms may be used for entities and statutes with widely recognized initials, briefs should not contain acronyms that are not widely known. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Procedures 41 (2013); Notice Regarding Use of Acronyms (D.C. Cir. Jan. 26, 2010).

Because the briefing schedule is keyed to the date of oral argument, the court will grant requests for extension of time limits only for extraordinarily compelling reasons. The briefs and appendix must contain the date the case is scheduled for oral argument at the top of the cover. See D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(8).

A separate order will issue regarding allocation of oral argument time.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Michael C. McGrail

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Halbig v. Burwell

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2014
No. 14-5018 (D.C. Cir. Sep. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Halbig v. Burwell

Case Details

Full title:Jacqueline Halbig, et al., Appellants v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell, in her…

Court:United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 4, 2014

Citations

No. 14-5018 (D.C. Cir. Sep. 4, 2014)

Citing Cases

Optimal Wireless LLC v. Internal Revenue Serv.

Because Congress repeatedly called the Section 4980H exaction a tax, Optimal's suit is barred by the…

Am. Council of Life Insurers v. Dist. of Columbia Health Benefit Exch. Auth.

The D.C. Circuit recently held that the ACA does not allow federal tax credit subsidies for insurance…