From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haddock v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Oct 19, 2018
255 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Summary

affirming sentence but remanding for correction of sentencing documents where trial court had granted rule 3.800(b) motion but where corrections had not been made

Summary of this case from Johnson v. State

Opinion

Case No. 2D17-2060

10-19-2018

Kristopher HADDOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm Kristopher Haddock's convictions and sentences but remand for the trial court to correct the sentencing documents. See In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149, 152 (Fla. 1991) ; Mobley v. State, 968 So.2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). The trial court had granted Haddock's motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), but no corrections have been made. Therefore, we remand for the trial court to correct the costs by removing the cost imposed pursuant to section 938.10, Florida Statutes (2016), and to reduce the cost imposed pursuant to section 938.085 from $453 to $302. In addition, the trial court shall correct the judgment and sentence to change the description of count one from "Kidnap-False Imprisonment Adult" to "False Imprisonment Adult." The trial court shall also correct the probation order to reflect these changes.

Our affirmance is without prejudice to Haddock's right to file a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed and remanded.

CASANUEVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).


Summaries of

Haddock v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Oct 19, 2018
255 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

affirming sentence but remanding for correction of sentencing documents where trial court had granted rule 3.800(b) motion but where corrections had not been made

Summary of this case from Johnson v. State
Case details for

Haddock v. State

Case Details

Full title:KRISTOPHER HADDOCK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 19, 2018

Citations

255 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Pirtle v. State

On remand, the trial court shall strike the $220 in court costs from the sentencing order and correct the…

Johnson v. State

Thus we must remand for entry of such documents. See Rodriguez v. State, 310 So.3d 465, 465-66 (Fla. 2d DCA…