From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 3, 1992
596 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-1462.

April 3, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Michael F. Cycmanick, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


At the scene of a stabbing, the victim made a statement to a police officer as to the identity of the person who stabbed the victim. The victim died and the police officer was permitted at the trial of the defendant to testify as to the statement made by the victim. The defendant was convicted of murder and appeals.

The deceased victim's statement to the police officer did not qualify for admission into evidence under the dying declaration exception to the hearsay rule but it was properly admitted under the res gestae exception to hearsay rule as explained in Monarca v. State, 412 So.2d 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and COWART and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 3, 1992
596 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Hack v. State

Case Details

Full title:MAJED HACK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 3, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 521 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

State v. Adams

Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence, § 803 at 598 (1996 ed.) (footnotes omitted). We note in passing that even after…