From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gundershein v. Bradley-Mahony Coal Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
295 N.Y. 539 (N.Y. 1946)

Opinion

Submitted May 22, 1946

Decided July 23, 1946

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, FRANKENTHALER, J.

Isidor Enselman and Louis Solomon for appellant.

Gregory A. Lee and Daniel Miner for Bradley-Mahony Coal Corporation, respondent.

John J. Stewart and John P. Smith for Vermilyea Realty Co., respondent.


The judgment dismissing the prior action brought in behalf of the infant plaintiff was ordered because of failure of diligent prosecution by the guardian ad litem. Since that judgment was not rendered upon the merits, it does not prevent the present action for the same cause of action (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482). Hence the present action, which was commenced within the period of the plaintiff's infancy, is not barred by the Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 49, subd. 6; § 60, subds. 1, 3).

The judgments should be reversed and the motions denied, with costs in all courts.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Gundershein v. Bradley-Mahony Coal Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 23, 1946
295 N.Y. 539 (N.Y. 1946)
Case details for

Gundershein v. Bradley-Mahony Coal Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID GUNDERSHEIN, an Infant, by ARTHUR GUNDERSHEIN, His Guardian ad…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 23, 1946

Citations

295 N.Y. 539 (N.Y. 1946)
68 N.E.2d 599

Citing Cases

O'Leary v. Brown Seal Realty Corp.

The fact that the first action brought by plaintiff's guardian ad litem was dismissed on procedural grounds,…

Ziegler v. Serrano

Initially, we find that Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs' summary judgment motion on res judicata…