From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grudzinski v. Voyer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 19, 1995
654 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-1506.

May 19, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County; Hale R. Stancil, Judge.

Scott Timothy Smith of Law Offices of James Martin Brown, Brooksville, for appellant.

Nancy L. McClain of McClain McClain, P.A., Zephyrhills, for appellee Lewis Gerard Voyer.

No appearance for appellee Collette Ann Voyer.


Debrah Grudzinski appeals a nonfinal order denying her petition to intervene in the child custody modification proceeding involving her grandchild. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari, and, finding no abuse of discretion, deny the petition. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.230; John G. Grubbs, Inc. v. Suncoast Excavating, Inc., 594 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (stating that intervention is not a matter of right, but rests within the trial court's discretion).

Chriss v. Chriss, 417 So.2d 835, 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (nonfinal order denying motion to intervene reviewable by way of common law certiorari).

PETITION DENIED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Grudzinski v. Voyer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 19, 1995
654 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Grudzinski v. Voyer

Case Details

Full title:DEBRAH GRUDZINSKI, APPELLANT, v. COLLETTE ANN VOYER, ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 19, 1995

Citations

654 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Sup. Fence Rail v. O. Lucas

We take this opportunity to clarify decisional law from this Court regarding whether the denial of a motion…