From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gross v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 9, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant contends for the first time on appeal that the subject insurance policy's $300,000 maximum limit of liability for accidents involving bodily injury to two or more persons is subject to the policy's $100,000 maximum limit of liability for all damages for bodily injury sustained by any one person in an accident. Accordingly, the plaintiffs were entitled to an award of only $180,000.

The defendant's claim is not properly before the Court. An appellate court should not, and will not, consider theories or questions not presented in the court of first instance, if proof might have been offered to refute or overcome them had those theories or questions been presented in the court of first instance (see, Fresh Pond Rd. Assocs. v. Estate of Schacht, 120 A.D.2d 561).

Miller, J.P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gross v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Gross v. Aetna Casualty Surety Company

Case Details

Full title:ELIEZER GROSS et al., Respondents, v. AETNA CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 137

Citing Cases

Zektser v. Better Homes Depot, Inc.

Accordingly, the grant of summary judgment was proper. The plaintiffs' remaining contentions either are…

White Rose Food v. Apple Orchard Farms Corp.

The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal…