From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greene v. Correctional Medical Services

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jul 25, 2008
CIVIL ACTION 06-0779-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Jul. 25, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 06-0779-CG-M.

July 25, 2008


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

In his objection (Doc. 40), plaintiff argues that the magistrate judge incorrectly found that his claims against Dr. Sonnier are barred by Alabama's two-year statute of limitations. Plaintiff argues that his situation is covered by the "savings clause" in the Alabama Medical Liability Act, which provides that "if the cause of action is not discovered and could not reasonably have been discovered within [the two years], then the action may be commenced within six months from the date of discovery or the date of discovery of facts which would reasonably lead to such discover, whichever is earlier[.]" Ala. Code 1975 § 6-5-482(a). The statute of limitations begins to run when the first injury or harm occurs, although the injury may later become more severe or different in kind. Free v. Granger, 887 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir. 1989) (finding that cause of action accrued when patient first had infection, not when treated by the doctor); Ramey v. Guyton, 394 So.2d 2, 4 (Ala. 1980) (finding that cause of action accrued when patient had the stroke, not when doctor last saw patient and prescribed medicine). In this case, it is clear from the complaint that plaintiff knew there was an infection and problems with the procedures performed by Dr. Sonnier within several weeks of the surgery performed on September 3, 2004. That is when the statute of limitations began to run. His complaint, filed in on November 16, 2006, came too late.

Accordingly, iIt is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) because Plaintiff's claims are either frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send to the Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections a copy of the Report and Recommendation recommending the dismissal of this action, this Order adopting the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment dismissing this action.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Greene v. Correctional Medical Services

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jul 25, 2008
CIVIL ACTION 06-0779-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Jul. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Greene v. Correctional Medical Services

Case Details

Full title:GARY P. GREENE, AIS # 237553, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 25, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 06-0779-CG-M (S.D. Ala. Jul. 25, 2008)