From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenberg v. Greenberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan 3, 2014
129 So. 3d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2D12–6011.

2014-01-3

Brad GREENBERG, Appellant, v. Francyne GREENBERG, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Catherine M. Catlin, Judge. Matthew E. Thatcher of The Solomon Law Group, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Virginia R. Vetter, Tampa, and Donald P. DeCort, Tampa, for Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Catherine M. Catlin, Judge.


Matthew E. Thatcher of The Solomon Law Group, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Virginia R. Vetter, Tampa, and Donald P. DeCort, Tampa, for Appellee.
KHOUZAM, Judge.

The Former Husband timely appeals the circuit court's order on his supplemental petition for modification of alimony awarded to the Former Wife. The order denied his request for modification and directed him to pay 100 percent of her trial attorney's fees and costs without determining the amount. We affirm the denial of modification without comment. But we lack jurisdiction to review the award of attorney's fees and costs because an order determining entitlement to fees and costs without setting the amount is nonfinal and nonappealable. See Ritter v. Ritter, 690 So.2d 1372, 1376 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Affirmed in part, review denied in part, and remanded. VILLANTI and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Greenberg v. Greenberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan 3, 2014
129 So. 3d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Greenberg v. Greenberg

Case Details

Full title:Brad GREENBERG, Appellant, v. Francyne GREENBERG, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Jan 3, 2014

Citations

129 So. 3d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Valente v. Raissi

("An order determining an entitlement to attorney's fees and costs without setting the amount is a nonfinal,…

Glover v. Glover

The fee order is therefore nonfinal and nonappealable, and this Court lacks jurisdiction presently to review…