From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 19, 1981
281 S.E.2d 328 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

62013.

DECIDED MAY 19, 1981.

Burglary, etc. Haralson Superior Court. Before Judge Noland.

William L. Martin III, for appellant.

William A. Foster III, District Attorney, for appellee.


Charles Gray appeals from his conviction of burglary and attempted arson.

1. The trial court did not err in denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. The evidence showed that he was found inside the diner approximately one hour after it closed, that the walls had been soaked with a flammable substance, that the valve from the propane gas outlets had been shut off, that a jug of gasoline was in the sink and a five-gallon can of gasoline was on the floor, appellant had a cigarette lighter in his pocket and also had in his possession packets of chewing gum and headache powders of the type taken from the cash register.

2. This case, however, demands reversal and the grant of a new trial because the trial court failed to charge the jury on mistake of fact which constituted his sole defense. Henderson v. State, 141 Ga. App. 430 ( 233 S.E.2d 505) (1977). Appellant claimed that his car broke down and he went into the diner after he saw that the door was open and thought that someone was inside.

As this case must be retried, it is unnecessary to rule upon the remaining enumeration of errors as they are not likely to recur.

Judgment reversed. Banke and Carley, JJ., concur.

DECIDED MAY 19, 1981 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 19, 1981
281 S.E.2d 328 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Gray v. State

Case Details

Full title:GRAY v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 19, 1981

Citations

281 S.E.2d 328 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
281 S.E.2d 328

Citing Cases

Price v. State

The Court of Appeals' conclusion that a mistake of fact charge was not authorized in light of Price's denial…

Pitts v. State

" "We have repeatedly held that failure to give this charge may be reversible where the defense of mistake of…