From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graves v. Giordano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 25, 1992
590 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Summary

reversing default final judgment where the violation of rule 1.500(c) was raised in a "motion for rehearing and to vacate the default"

Summary of this case from Cano v. Guardianship of Cano

Opinion

No. 91-1183.

December 27, 1991. Order on Denial of Rehearing March 25, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, C. Lavon Ward, J.

Frederick E. Graves and Betty Graves, pro se.

Oakley Gentry, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.


Appellees sued to foreclose a mortgage on realty in Broward County. Appellants' motion to dismiss was denied on November 21, 1990, with leave to answer within twenty days. On January 19, 1991, appellees filed a motion for default which was heard and granted on January 24, 1991, and filed with the clerk at 2:39 p.m. Appellants had filed a response to the motion for default, a motion to correct order, and an answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaim on the same day, January 24, 1991, at 10:39 a.m. Thus, the record reflects that at the time the order granting a default was filed with the clerk the appellants' various pleadings had already been filed. The trial court denied appellants' motion for rehearing and to vacate the default and this appeal ensued.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(c) provides that "a party may plead or otherwise defend at any time before default is entered." Furthermore, "an order may not be deemed to have been entered, notwithstanding its having been signed by the court, until it is actually filed with the clerk." Chester, Blackburn Roder, Inc. v. Marchese, 383 So.2d 734, 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The record reflects that, when the default was "entered," appellant's answer and other pleadings were already filed. Thus, under the aforementioned rule, entry of a default was inappropriate.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate the order of default and subsequent proceedings and for further appropriate proceedings.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DOWNEY and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

ORDERED that appellees' Petition for rehearing filed January 27, 1992, is hereby denied and stricken; further,

ORDERED that upon consideration of appellants' February 11, 1992, motion, the motion to strike petition for rehearing is hereby granted, the motion for entry of sanctions, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, is hereby denied.


Summaries of

Graves v. Giordano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 25, 1992
590 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

reversing default final judgment where the violation of rule 1.500(c) was raised in a "motion for rehearing and to vacate the default"

Summary of this case from Cano v. Guardianship of Cano
Case details for

Graves v. Giordano

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK E. GRAVES AND BETTY GRAVES, APPELLANTS, v. VINCENT A. GIORDANO…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 25, 1992

Citations

590 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

TLC Trust v. Sender

A default is, therefore, improper when a party has filed a responsive pleading prior to the entry of default.…

Lenhal Realty v. Transamerica Com. Fin

At the hearing, the trial court granted appellees' motion for default against appellants; however, that order…