From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Granholm v. Heald

U.S.
May 24, 2004
541 U.S. 1062 (2004)

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

No. 03-1116.

May 24, 2004.


C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: "Does a State's regulatory scheme that permits in-state wineries directly to ship alcohol to consumers but restricts the ability of out-of-state wineries to do so violate the dormant Commerce Clause in light of § 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment?" Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: Nos. 03-1116 and 03-1120, 342 F. 3d 517; No. 03-1274, 358 F. 3d 223.


Summaries of

Granholm v. Heald

U.S.
May 24, 2004
541 U.S. 1062 (2004)
Case details for

Granholm v. Heald

Case Details

Full title:GRANHOLM, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, ET AL. v. HEALD ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 24, 2004

Citations

541 U.S. 1062 (2004)
124 S. Ct. 2389

Citing Cases

Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Kawamura

(See Cochran v. Veneman (3d Cir. 2004) 359 F.3d 263, 270 ["[t]he Dairy Act is a stand-alone law that was not…

United States v. Mosely

From this, Mosely reasons that he is entitled to a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).…