From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gowins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 23, 1999
745 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

driving records certified by machine imprint are to be accepted as evidence where no genuine issue of authenticity is raised

Summary of this case from Sylvester v. State

Opinion

No. 98-3272.

Opinion Filed December 23, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, J. Preston Silvernail, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary G. Jolley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Pursuant to section 322.201, Florida Statutes (1997), driving records certified by machine imprint are to be accepted as evidence where no genuine issue of authenticity is raised. Kohler v. State, 534 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Accordingly, appellant's conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

ANTOON, C.J., HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gowins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 23, 1999
745 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

driving records certified by machine imprint are to be accepted as evidence where no genuine issue of authenticity is raised

Summary of this case from Sylvester v. State
Case details for

Gowins v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. GOWINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 23, 1999

Citations

745 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Sylvester v. State

If the computerized record presented here is admissible, as I believe it to be, then this unrefuted record…