From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Gomez-Cortes

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Jul 18, 2022
No. 20-21558-CIV-WILLIAMS (S.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2022)

Opinion

20-21558-CIV-WILLIAMS

07-18-2022

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOSE DEJESUS GOMEZ-CORTES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres' Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) (DE 208) on Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Jose DeJesus Gomez-Cortes (“Plaintiffs' Motion”) (DE 179). In the Report, Chief Magistrate Judge Torres recommends that the Court grant Plaintiffs' Motion (DE 179). Defendant filed no objections to the Report and the time to file objections has lapsed.

Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The Report (DE 208) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment (DE 179) is GRANTED, as follows:

a. Plaintiffs' request for default judgment against Defendant Jose DeJesus Gomez-Cortes is GRANTED.
b. Plaintiffs' request for damages in the total amount of $7,750,365.57 plus post-judgment interest at the current statutory rate is GRANTED.

3. The Court will separately enter an order of final default judgment against Defendant Jose DeJesus Gomez-Cortes.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, on this 18th day of July, 2022.


Summaries of

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Gomez-Cortes

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Jul 18, 2022
No. 20-21558-CIV-WILLIAMS (S.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Gomez-Cortes

Case Details

Full title:GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOSE DEJESUS…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Jul 18, 2022

Citations

No. 20-21558-CIV-WILLIAMS (S.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2022)

Citing Cases

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Sosa

“damages resulting from each of the Clinic Defendants' fraudulent PIP billing to GEICO” on claims of FDUTPA…