From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gover v. Escudo Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-10277

Argued October 25, 2001.

November 26, 2001.

In an action to recover money owed pursuant to the terms of a joint venture agreement, the defendants Escudo Construction Corp. and Maria Fernandes appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), entered September 28, 2000, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $25,000.

Cohen Warren, P.C., Smithtown, N.Y. (Michael F. Cohen of counsel), for appellants.

Donner, Hariton Berka, LLP, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Aaron B. Donner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is modified by deleting the provision thereof awarding the principal sum of $25,000 and substituting therefor a provision awarding the principal sum of $23,290; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to recompute the amount of interest due on the award.

There were sufficient facts on the record to support a finding that the appellants breached the fiduciary duty owed the plaintiff as their partner in an ongoing joint venture, even though the plaintiff's complaint asserted a cause of action sounding in fraud and not breach of fiduciary duty (see, Diemer v. Diemer, 8 N.Y.2d 206, 212).

Nevertheless, the court erred in awarding the plaintiff the sum of $25,000, based upon a determination that the appellants' expenses were $7,500. Instead, the evidence shows that these expenses totalled $9,210, $1,710 more than the amount calculated by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the award to the plaintiff must be reduced by $1,710.

The appellants' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., McGINITY, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gover v. Escudo Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Gover v. Escudo Construction Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD L. GOVER, respondent, v. ESCUDO CONSTRUCTION CORP., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 894

Citing Cases

Solutia Inc. v. FMC Corp.

The JVA memorialized the parties' status as joint venturers, each owing a fiduciary duty to the other. See…

Bronx Legal Services v. Legal Services for New York City

Parties to a joint venture owe one another a fiduciary duty. See Gover v. Escudo Constr. Corp., 733 N.Y.S.2d…