From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 7, 1992
595 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Summary

affirming summary judgment where the facts did not make out a continuing tort when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff

Summary of this case from Aristide v. Jackson Memorial Hosp

Opinion

No. 91-246.

March 3, 1992. Rehearing Denied April 7, 1992.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; S. Peter Capua, Judge.

Rivkind Pedraza and Brett Rivkind, Miami, for appellant.

Hickey Jones and John H. Hickey and Gary R. Jones and Amy R. Trotto, Miami, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


Minor Gomez, plaintiff below, appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendant Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., in an action under the Jones Act. We conclude that, construed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the facts do not make out a continuing tort, see Fowkes v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 264 F.2d 397, 398 (3d Cir. 1959); Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Holt, 92 So.2d 169, 170 (Fla. 1956) (FELA action), nor was there negligent reassignment.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Gomez v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 7, 1992
595 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

affirming summary judgment where the facts did not make out a continuing tort when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff

Summary of this case from Aristide v. Jackson Memorial Hosp
Case details for

Gomez v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MINOR GOMEZ, APPELLANT, v. CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 7, 1992

Citations

595 So. 2d 227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Aristide v. Jackson Memorial Hosp

Therefore, Aristide failed to sufficiently allege a continuing tort. See Pearson v. Ford Motor Company, 694…