From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldfarb v. Reicher

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1934
174 A. 900 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Submitted May 25, 1934 —

Decided September 27, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 112 N.J.L. 413.

For the appellant, Saltzman Bunevich.

For the respondents, Max L. Rosenstein.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Goldfarb v. Reicher

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1934
174 A. 900 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Goldfarb v. Reicher

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN GOLDFARB, APPELLANT, v. HARRY J. REICHER ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 27, 1934

Citations

174 A. 900 (N.J. 1934)
174 A. 900