From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gimenez v. Barry

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 8, 1991
572 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-958.

January 8, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Jack Turner, Judge.

Munilla Armas and J. Alfredo de Armas, Miami, for appellants.

James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.


Finding that the conclusory affidavit submitted by defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment failed to demonstrate the absence of genuine issues of material fact, Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966); North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Royster, 544 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Gruber v. Mount Sinai Hosp. of Greater Miami, Inc., 487 So.2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Brooks v. Serrano, 209 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), we reverse the final summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Gimenez v. Barry

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 8, 1991
572 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Gimenez v. Barry

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS A. GIMENEZ AND LOURDES GIMENEZ, APPELLANTS, v. TERRENCE J. BARRY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 8, 1991

Citations

572 So. 2d 35 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Verchick v. Hecht Investments, Ltd.

Verchick and Bocelli submitted conclusory affidavits stating that they were employed by Hecht Ltd. Both…