From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert, et al., v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Oct 21, 1941
4 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1941)

Opinion

Opinion Filed October 21, 1941

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record, Dade County, Ben C. Willard, Judge.

J.F. Gordon and Burnett Roth for Appellants;

Robert R. Taylor and Thos. H. Anderson, for Appellee.


Appeal brings for review judgments of conviction of the offense of unlawfully living in an open state of adultery.

The sole challenge is to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment.

The record discloses no motion for new trial. Therefore, review of error predicated on insufficiency of evidence is not available. See Schmids v. Tampa Pub. Co., 72 Fla. 571, 73 So. 593; St. Andrews Bay Lbr. Co. v. Bernard, 106 Fla. 232, 143 So. 159; Davis v. State, 47 Fla. 26, 36 So. 170; Florida Power Co. v. Cason, 79 Fla. 619, 84 So. 921; Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Beville, 86 Fla. 479, 98 So. 354; 356, citing Greenblatt v. Bissell Dry Goods Co., 85 Fla. 83, 95 So. 302; Johnson v. State, 53 Fla. 42, 43 So. 430; Thomas Bros. Co. v. Price, 56 Fla. 854, 48 So. 262.

No reversible error appearing from the record, the judgments are affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Gilbert, et al., v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A
Oct 21, 1941
4 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1941)
Case details for

Gilbert, et al., v. State

Case Details

Full title:ABE GILBERT and EDITH HOPPEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Division A

Date published: Oct 21, 1941

Citations

4 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1941)
4 So. 2d 330

Citing Cases

Hogwood v. State

The later rulings pronounced in civil cases, tried by jury, wherein a party had moved for a directed verdict…

York v. State

This omission is fatal to defendant's position and he cannot now for the first time raise the question of…