From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gieseke v. Gieseke

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 18, 1986
499 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Summary

indicating that the propriety of an award of appellate attorney's fees is a prerogative of the appellate court

Summary of this case from Computer Task Gp. v. Palm Beach Cty

Opinion

No. 85-1938.

January 22, 1986. Rehearing Denied February 18, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, John G. Ferris, J.

Michael R. Bass of Lerner Harris, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


In this interlocutory appeal, we consider the husband's assertion that the trial court's order requiring him to pay attorney's fees and costs "for the [wife's cross-] appeal" from the final judgment of dissolution requires reversal. Agreeing that the trial court lacked authority to enter the subject order, we reverse.

In order to obtain fees and costs for the preparation of an appeal, a litigant must first request the fees from the appellate court. Fla.R.App.P. 9.400(b). Thornton v. Thornton, 433 So.2d 682 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Winner v. Winner, 376 So.2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Mullins v. Mullins, 342 So.2d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Ludemann v. Ludemann, 317 So.2d 860 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). "The question of whether to award attorney's fees for services on appeal in domestic litigation is a prerogative of the appellate court." Thornton, 433 So.2d at 684; Ludemann, 317 So.2d at 861. "The assessment of attorney's fees may be remanded to the lower tribunal." Fla.R.App.P. 9.400(b).

Appellate costs may be taxed in the lower court only after the issuance of a mandate by the appellate court. Mullins. The wife's contention that Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.600(c) authorizes the trial court to assess fees and costs lacks merit. The attorney's fees and costs discussed in rule 9.600(c) are limited to those incurred in the trial court; the rule does not contemplate the taxation of fees or costs for appeal preparation. Winner. See Thornton; Mullins; Ludemann.

Accordingly, we reverse the order entered below.

BASKIN, NATALIE, PEARSON, DANIEL S., and FERGUSON, WILKIE D., Jr., Associate Judges, concur.


Summaries of

Gieseke v. Gieseke

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 18, 1986
499 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

indicating that the propriety of an award of appellate attorney's fees is a prerogative of the appellate court

Summary of this case from Computer Task Gp. v. Palm Beach Cty

In Gieseke, the Fourth District held that the trial court had no authority to award attorney fees "for the [wife's cross-] appeal" from a final judgment of dissolution. It was held that in order to obtain fees and costs on appeal, a litigant must first make the request to the appellate court.

Summary of this case from Boyer v. Boyer
Case details for

Gieseke v. Gieseke

Case Details

Full title:F. GARY GIESEKE, APPELLANT, v. HAYDEE GIESEKE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 18, 1986

Citations

499 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Boyer v. Boyer

A similar motion was presented to the trial court, pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes (1989) and…

Watson v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A.

Having determined that the trial court properly found entitlement to section 57.105 fees on its own…