From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrett v. Tomas

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Jun 30, 2021
1:21-cv-00110-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Jun. 30, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00110-MR-WCM

06-30-2021

DONNA GARRETT Plaintiff, v. DR. DON TOMAS, in his personal and official capacity as President of Southwestern Community College; DR. THOM BROOKS, in his personal capacity and official capacity as Executive Vice President of Instruction and Student Services of Southwestern Community College; DR. MITCH FISCHER in his personal capacity and official capacity as Dean of Health Science of Southwestern Community College; WENDY BUCHANAN, in her personal capacity and official capacity as Director of the Nursing Program of Southwestern Community College; and THE TRUSTEES OF SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendants.


ORDER

W. CARLETON METCALF, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3), which has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for the entry of a recommendation.

The undersigned has reviewed the parties' briefing relative to the Motion to Dismiss, as well as relevant authorities, and finds that a more thorough discussion of certain issues may aid in the decisional process. Specifically, the parties will be directed to address the following:

1. The extent to which courts have made affirmative findings regarding the existence of a constitutionally protected right to continued enrollment at an institution of higher education for purposes of a claim alleging violation of the due process requirements of the North Carolina Constitution or the Constitution of the United States, and noting whether such decisions have been rendered at the motion to dismiss stage, summary judgment, or at trial.

2. Whether a constitutionally protected right to continued enrollment at an institution of higher education was “clearly established” at all times relevant to this matter, for purposes of Defendants' qualified immunity defense. See e.g., Doe v. White, 440 F.Supp.3d 1074 (N.D. Cal. 2020), aff'd, No. 20-15450, 2021 WL 2206459 (9th Cir. June 1, 2021).

Each side shall submit a supplemental brief on these topics, with each brief not to exceed 10 pages in length, on or before July 16, 2021.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Garrett v. Tomas

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Jun 30, 2021
1:21-cv-00110-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Jun. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Garrett v. Tomas

Case Details

Full title:DONNA GARRETT Plaintiff, v. DR. DON TOMAS, in his personal and official…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00110-MR-WCM (W.D.N.C. Jun. 30, 2021)