From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 22, 1989
552 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 1989)

Opinion

No. 73555.

November 22, 1989.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions Third District — Case No. 87-2543 (Dade County).

Peter Raben of the Law Office of Peter Raben, P.A., Coconut Grove, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Yvette Rhodes Prescott and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.


We have for review Garcia v. State, 535 So.2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), based on certified conflict with Niblack v. State, 451 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), and Lowe v. State, 500 So.2d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

This case presents the question of whether it is reversible error for a trial court to refuse to reinstruct on justifiable and excusable homicide when it reinstructs on manslaughter. We recently have answered this question in the affirmative in Stockton v. State, 544 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 1989). Accordingly, we quash the opinion below and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Stockton.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Garcia v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 22, 1989
552 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 1989)
Case details for

Garcia v. State

Case Details

Full title:RIGOBERTO GARCIA, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 22, 1989

Citations

552 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 1989)

Citing Cases

Hoffert v. State

In denying appellant's motion, the trial court found that since the jury rejected the possibility that…

Rojas v. State

Relying upon its opinion in Stockton, this Court has now quashed the Garcia opinion of the Third District…