From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garcia v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Texas
Nov 20, 1991
817 S.W.2d 59 (Tex. 1991)

Opinion

No. D-0949.

October 16, 1991. Rehearing Overruled November 20, 1991.

Appeal from the 260th District Court, Hidalgo County, Joe B. Evins, J.

James P. Wallace, Austin, Dana Allison Lester, Brownsville, Guy Allison, Corpus Christi, Thomas J. Sims, Houston, Roger W. Hughes, Tom Lockhard, Harlingen, Fred Knapp, Jr., Houston, for petitioner.

Bob Roberts, Austin, Roberto M. Garcia, Edinburg, Larry J. Doherty, Houston, for respondent.


ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR


Under common law, a creditor's acceptance of a check bearing the notation "in full payment" or similar language operates as an accord and satisfaction. See Industrial Life Insurance Co. v. Finley, 382 S.W.2d 100, 106 (Tex. 1964). Petitioner Ramon Garcia asks us to decide whether Tex.Bus. Com. Code Sec. 1.207 abrogates this common-law rule. The court of appeals held that it does, and reversed summary judgment in favor of Garcia. 804 S.W.2d 238. The court of appeals should not have reached this issue, however, because the Robinsons did not raise it in the trial court or brief it on appeal. See Tex.R.Civ.P. 166a(c); Vawter v. Garvey, 786 S.W.2d 263 (Tex. 1990). We neither approve nor disapprove of the court of appeals' discussion or resolution of this question.

Although the court of appeals decided the case on improper grounds, there is no reversible error in its judgment. Accordingly, we deny both parties' applications for writ of error.


Summaries of

Garcia v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Texas
Nov 20, 1991
817 S.W.2d 59 (Tex. 1991)
Case details for

Garcia v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:Ramon GARCIA, Ramon Garcia P.C., and Texas Commerce Bancshares v. Edward…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Nov 20, 1991

Citations

817 S.W.2d 59 (Tex. 1991)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Montgomery Cty. Hosp Dist

Brown did not allege at the trial court level, and does not raise on appeal, that she was actually…

Warmack Co. v. Beltz

We are restricted to addressing the arguments actually raised, not those that might have been raised. Garcia…